Grant Deliverable A

General Deliverables

a. Each consortium, in consideration of the ARPDC goals, will work collaboratively with regional advisory committees (comprised of representatives from school authorities) and with one another to develop implementation plans, strategies and opportunities to meet provincial and locally identified needs in congruence with provincial direction.

Connecting the Dots

ERLC Goals
Mission:
“Partners in Adult Learning for Students’ Sake”

Outcomes
ERLC will model a responsive service oriented approach through collaborative practices

Actions
Each School jurisdiction was invited to send a representative to a planning meeting in June 2009. Initial conversations about the 2009-2010 plan began in March 2009 at a meeting following the CASS Curriculum Symposium. The group provided advice and direction to the building of the regional implementation plan; and will provide ongoing feedback about the plan, communicate the intent of the plan, gather evidence of success within their organizational network, identify future regional needs based on district needs and collaborate together to share lessons learned.

ERLC facilitates 8 – 10 different advisory committee meetings that meet between 2-3 times a year. The fall 2009 meetings provided advice and direction for program planning.

Executive Directors work collaboratively and meet formally between 4 – 6 times per year. Informal meetings, including emails, phone conversations and webinars are very frequent!

Metrics

“The Consortium was effective in helping us address PD needs identified in our planning documents”. District Survey
Workshop register
Advisory Committee List and meeting summary

Report

Appendix D – Survey of ERLC District Contacts, Question #1 to come in report
Appendix C-1- Workshop Register 2009-2010
Appendix C-2 – Advisory Committee List 2009-2010, See specific subject area summaries

Performance Measure	Target	Result 08-09	Result 09-10	Result 10-11
Percentage of district contacts who agree that PD offerings align with needs identified in their plans.	95%	100%	93%
Percentage of district contacts that shared overall satisfaction with ERLC	95%	95%	100%
Percentage of program participants that indicated satisfaction that the sessions provided content and activities which matched the intended outcomes.	98%	99%	95%
Percentage of district contacts that share ERLC facilitated PD supports effective implementation of curricula.	95%	94.5%	93%
Percentage of PD program participants satisfied that they are able to apply the information learned in their classroom	95%	98%	93%
Number of Participants attending	22,000	21,126	34,245

Performance Measure	Target	Result 08-09	Result 09-10	Result 10-11
Percentage of district contacts who agree that PD offerings align with needs identified in their plans.	95%	100%	93%
List of advisory committee meetings and participants (workshop register, meeting summaries)	# of meetings and participants	See 08-09 Report	Appendix C-1, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, Q, R

ERLC Advisory Committee members responded to the questions:

What will you accept as evidence that ERLC is complimenting/supporting your district PD plan in relation to teacher professional practice?
See Appendix G-2